DMCz asked:


I was recently employed by a video rental store that does not offer online mail rentals, and in some of the paperwork that I signed, it said that I would not work for any other competitor while I was employed with them or one year after leaving that company. This job requires actually being in the store and renting out movies to customers. Technically I haven’t started training yet.

Anyway, since I’ve been looking for work, I’ve applied at many different places. A temp agency just found me a job to work in a warehouse for an online movie rental company. They only deal in online mail movie rentals and have no stores for customers to come by and rent movies like the place I am currently employed at. At this job I would only be receiving returned rentals through the mail and shipping off new rentals. Technically I would be employed by the temp agency until and if this company decides to hire me, since I am labelled temp-to-hire.

These two companies are in the same industry—Any problems?

Share This Post:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • De.lirio.us
  • Furl
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • scuttle
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb
  • blogmarks
  • Bumpzee
  • eKudos
  • Faves
  • Spurl
  • TwitThis

One Response to “Non-compete clause in California question. Do my two jobs conflict?”

  • 2Beagles:

    Though both businesses deal with movies, they are technically different in the way they do their business.. The first one deals directly with customers in a store, say like a local video store, while the second one is like Netflix. I really don’t see any competition here, but to be safe, you could always ask the video rental store to see if there would be a problem by you working at the other company. That would seem the simplest way to solve your question.

PVP